Saturday, April 16, 2011

Changing America and the World for the Common Good [cross-post]







There was a time when I thought that a handful of committed persons, wholly dedicated to their cause, could change the world. After all, Margaret Mead had said we could. It was really the fantasy of someone who was an imagined elitist. I made friends with some other would-be elitists who had the same idea.

Together we would think up a new world order, planned to work our way up into places of influence in the highest echelons of power, and promote our scenario for a brave new world. We thought that there would be no need to mobilize the masses. Gaining access to the “power elite,” as sociologists call these movers and shakers, would give us the key to bring about social change.



We weren't egoists in the worst sense. We didn’t care if we became famous, but only cared about doing something significant with our lives. We wanted to believe that, in the end, when we hung up our sneakers for the last time, we would have a sense that we had made a difference for good. Our only desire was to hear a voice from on high declaring, “Well done, thou good and faithful servants.” Like Abraham of old, we sought a city, the maker of which was God. It would be a city marked with love and justice, and where, as it says in Acts 2 of the Christian Bible, everyone would be willing to live generously toward others, so that no one would be in need. Even those among us who claimed not to be religious shared in this beatific vision, and in many cases their faith in that vision transcended that possessed by those who claimed to be believers.

Ours was to be a “top down” revolution. We were convinced that if we could get the right people into political offices—people who shared our vision—this hoped for shalom could happen. It was our conviction that if we could just get our government leaders to tap into what we were sure were latent reservoirs of goodness that lay in the depths of the captains of business and industry, they would establish a new ‘bottom line” in their ledgers which counted the good they had done and not just the dollars that they had made. Then the prophesies, such as those of the prophet Isaiah, would break loose in history (Isaiah 65:17ff).

We were wrong! At least partly wrong. The idea that if a special few of us could get to those at the top of society’s systems of power, wealth and prestige, and share with them our spiritual values, bringing them “under conviction,” we then could get them to make vast improvements in our socio-economic systems was fallacious. Over time, we have gradually come to realize that something much more far reaching that that was needed. The truth gradually dawned on us that the revolutionary transformation we sought could only emerge if our own character and the character of our people—the American people—would change. Laying aside our elitism, we came to see that it was not just the people at the top who had to change. It was also the rest of us! All of us who make up the masses of America would have to change. We run-of-the-mill Americans, of whom I am one, would have to come to admit that we have become enslaved by a comfortable, enjoyable, entertaining, self-serving, and affluent consumeristic lifestyle. That we have become addicted to the “good life” that has been defined for us by the selling power of the media, and have come to make our goal for life the accumulation of the things that the merchants of our capitalistic society say we have to have. The change that we want has to begin with us. As a people, we Americans must become the change, that hope for society, and stop expecting that change will come from the top down.

We Americans have become quite adept at blaming the custodians of our social institutions for the economic meltdown that now threatens our materialistic way of life. We say:

It’s those bankers who, with their sub-prime lending rates, have brought on this crisis!

It’s those people in Congress and the President who, guided by a free market ideology, have failed to regulate the financial institutions on Wall Street who have brought America down!

It’s those militarists who, with their love of war and their strategies of establishing military bases in far-flung places, have been responsible for bleeding our economic surpluses dry!

It’s those Arabs who, having turned off the spigot and cut the supply of oil that we need to keep the engines of our good life running, who are deserving of blame!

And, yes! In spite of our claims of anti-Semitism, we even have blamed the Israelis who, with their belligerent policies towards the Palestinians, have dragged us all into their conflict with an Arab world that is marked by terrorism—with all its socio-economic consequences.

We blame everybody but ourselves!

We Americans act as though we are innocent, and are the unfortunate victims of the economic meltdown. We pretend that it’s not our fault that forces are at work bringing down our nation and challenging our way of life. But in reality, what is happening is more our own doing as individual middle-class Americans, than it is any of those political and economic power brokers we point to as the villains. It is our own self-centered, self-absorbed, self-indulgent, and self-serving character that has made us into the real culprits.

Jesus taught that social transformation occurs when converted persons seek the common good. Such persons inevitably permeate society like leaven and transform it (Matthew 13:33). He called us to become those persons when He said, “You are the salt of the earth” (Matthew 5:13).

The Hebrew prophet, Zechariah, claimed to have a word from God when he said, “Not by might, nor by power, but by my spirit, says the Lord of hosts” (Zechariah 4:6). That is a word that must guide us during these perilous times.

The Ryan Plan: A Declaration of War on the Poor [cross-post]

The Ryan Plan: A Declaration of War on the Poor








I’ve been fasting for 18 days in solidarity with the hunger fast for a moral budget because something incredible is happening in our country, and we haven’t seen anything like it in 30 years. When introduced on February 11, H.R. 1, the FY2011 spending bill approved by the House, proposed $100 billion in cuts to this year’s budget. Two-thirds of H.R.1’s cuts will directly affect working and poor people.


Then, on April 5, Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI) introduced a 2012 budget that is much, much, much worse than H.R.1. Ryan’s budget would put all the burden for balancing the budget on poor people, while at the same time cutting the tax rate for people in the top income bracket from 35 percent to 25 percent.

Some historical context on federal individual income tax rates can help us understand the gravity of this proposed budget plan:
  • In 1945, at the end of World War II, the top marginal tax rate was 94 percent.
  • In 1954, when Republican Dwight Eisenhower was president, the top marginal tax rate was 91 percent.
  • In 1980, the year Reagan won his presidential election, the top marginal tax rate was 70 percent.
  • By 1989, the year Ronald Reagan’s presidency ended, the top marginal tax rate was 28 percent.
  • When Clinton took office in 1992, he raised the top marginal tax rate to 39.6 percent, where it stayed throughout his presidency.
  • Clinton balanced the budget and left office with a surplus.
  • Bush Jr. chipped away at the top marginal rate until it rested at 35 percent in 2003, where it remains to this day.
Americans (Republicans and Democrats) used to take pride in paying their taxes. Our contributions made this nation great. We lived on less and paid our fair share to make sure all of our most basic needs were met. That changed in the 1980s with the onset of Reagan’s “trickle-down” economics. Reagan slashed the budget more than any president before him and drastically lowered the top marginal tax rate. And we found the trickle didn’t go far. Most Americans never felt one drop.

Now, in the middle of a time of war; in the middle of the greatest economic crisis since the Great Depression; in the face of history which teaches us that balanced budgets require extra revenue from top marginal tax payers (not just cuts to services for the poor) — in this context — Rep. Paul Ryan has proposed the lowest top marginal tax rate since the onset of the Great Depression and the death of services to the poor, domestically and abroad.

Did you know the top 400 richest Americans have more wealth than the bottom 50 percent combined?

Did you know CEO pay has increased by 20 percent to a median pay of $9.6 million for top executives at 200 major companies since 2009, while worker pay has remained virtually unchanged (decreased by 0.1 percent) in the same period?

The Ryan plan is not fiscal responsibility; it is a declaration of war on the poor. The GOP is currently being led by blind ideology that has potential to literally kill people — real people made in the image of God.

And so, I fast.

And last week NY Faith & Justice board members Veronica Black (Rainbow Push), Gary Wiley (Trinity Grace Church), Peter Heltzel (Micah Institute), Derrick Boykin (Bread for the World), and Tim Bomgardner (World Vision) joined the hunger fast as well! Together, we are fasting with more than 40,000 Americans who are hungry for a moral budget.

As Palm Sunday approaches and Easter rounds the corner, let us remember Jesus’ last sermon before going to the cross: “Just as you did to one of the least of these who are members of my family, you did to me.” (Matthew 25: 40)



Lisa Sharon Harper is the executive director of New York Faith & Justice and author of Evangelical Does Not Equal Republican … or Democrat.





Do I Deny the Resurrection? [cross-post]





Do I Deny the Resurrection?






Occasionally I get emails demanding to know my stance on a particular piece of “historic orthodoxy”. People wonder about my view of hell, or who I think Jesus was or if I think there will be a second coming. Since the controversy over Rob Bell’s latest book (which happens to have the same name as our ministry http://lovewins.info), this has only increased.

To tell you the truth, I think it is a bit funny. After all, I run a ministry for homeless people. Perhaps it would be more appropriate to ask my views on homelessness? But I digress …

So, to answer the title of this entry – do I deny the resurrection of Christ?

I can do no better than to quote Peter Rollins http://peterrollins.net/?p=136 on the subject.

Without equivocation or hesitation I fully and completely admit that I deny the resurrection of Christ. This is something that anyone who knows me could tell you, and I am not afraid to say it publicly, no matter what some people may think…

I deny the resurrection of Christ every time I do not serve at the feet of the oppressed, each day that I turn my back on the poor; I deny the resurrection of Christ when I close my ears to the cries of the downtrodden and lend my support to an unjust and corrupt system.

However there are moments when I affirm that resurrection, few and far between as they are. I affirm it when I stand up for those who are forced to live on their knees, when I speak for those who have had their tongues torn out, when I cry for those who have no more tears left to shed.
As you might expect, this does not calm the questioners down. They accuse me of not understanding the question. I understand the question perfectly well. I think they are the ones who do not know what they are asking.

So let me be even more clear:

The ancient story is that the most powerful government the world had ever known, Rome, had done the worst thing it could imagine to this man Jesus. They beat him and killed him by the most brutal means at their disposal. Yet and still, the last words on his lips are reported to be his asking God to forgive his killers. On that Friday, the powers of the world said “No” to Jesus and the Kingdom of God he was preaching. If the tomb was empty on that Sunday morning long ago, that was God’s “Yes” to Rome’s “No”. If the tomb was empty, then love overcame power and vindicated Jesus. It means that Jesus was right – the Kingdom of God is at hand, and we are invited to live in it.

If I swear allegiance to this Kingdom, where apparently the dream of God is that it be on Earth as it is in Heaven, then that has implications for how I live. If I pledge allegiance to the USA, it means I should not sell secrets to China. If I pledge allegiance to the Kingdom of God, then I cannot see how I can lend aid and support to the powers that oppose it, such as consumerism, militarism, class disparity and xenophobia.

If I act hateful, or in fact, less than loving to my neighbor, I have denied the resurrection just as surely as my selling state secrets to China denies my allegiance to the USA. I can wave a flag all day, but if I am acting against my country, you can hardly call me a patriot. And I can believe whatever you want about what happened that Sunday morning, but if I am not using what power I have to help God bring the Kingdom into fruition, to help make it on Earth as it is in Heaven, I don’t expect you to call me a Christian.

+ + + + + + +




Hugh Hollowell http://hughlh.com/articles is an activist, a speaker and a Mennonite minister. He is the founder and director of Love Wins Ministries http://lovewins.info where he pastors a congregation made up largely of people who are homeless.